"Challenged" books–or what we shouldn’t read?

The ALA received 547 written complaints in 2004 requesting certain materials be removed from schools or libraries because of content or appropriateness. Here’s the 2004 list.

  • The Chocolate War for sexual content, offensive language, religious viewpoint, being unsuited to age group and violence.
  • Fallen Angels by Walter Dean Myers, for racism, offensive language and violence
  • Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture by Michael A. Bellesiles, for inaccuracy and political viewpoint
  • Captain Underpants series by Dav Pilkey, for offensive language and modeling bad behavior Blogger note here: ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME? oh. sorry. that was offensive language and modeling bad behavior. BUT HONESTLY–CAPTAIN UNDERPANTS? Some little letter writers need to get a big fat sense of humor and wrap it up with a big pink bow.
  • The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky, for homosexuality, sexual content and offensive language
  • What My Mother Doesn’t Know by Sonya Sones, for sexual content and offensive language
  • In the Night Kitchen by Maurice Sendak, for nudity and offensive language
  • King & King by Linda de Haan and Stern Nijland, for homosexuality
  • I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou, for racism, homosexuality, sexual content, offensive language and unsuited to age group Blogger note: Heavy, heartfelt sigh.
  • Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck, for racism, offensive language and violence Blogger note: Good Lord. What’s next?

How sad is this?

3 thoughts on “"Challenged" books–or what we shouldn’t read?

  1. They’re trying to whitewash (and yes, that word was chosen deliberately) our literature to the point where it resembles the plain bedsheets that used to be the only choice– white, devoid of all color or pattern, and smelling faintly of bleach.Pisses me off beyond all redemption how fucking PC people have gotten.

    Like

Leave a reply to Mel Francis Cancel reply